Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Interesting BBC Documentary on JFK Assassination

JFK CIA Bush Family Nixon

  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

#1 Adele Edisen

Adele Edisen

    Founding Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 643 posts

Posted 28 September 2014 - 09:27 PM

BBC Documentary - JFK II - Video

 

One hour and 28 minutes long.

 


  • Raymondol, ThomasMurf, Horaciokr and 2 others like this

#2 Brian Kelshaw

Brian Kelshaw

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 190 posts
  • LocationWolverhampton, UK.

Posted 29 September 2014 - 04:18 AM

Interesting Adele, I think I've watched it on YouTube a short while ago. Not BBC though, unless by BBC you mean an acronym I'm not familiar with.
  • Raymondol, ThomasMurf and Horaciokr like this

#3 Adele Edisen

Adele Edisen

    Founding Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 643 posts

Posted 29 September 2014 - 11:20 PM

Brian, this is what it said below the video on You Tube.

I think BBC stands for British Broadcasting Company.

We used to listen to the BBC on my father's short-wave

radio during World War II.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

JFK Conspiracy Theories That Turned Out To Be True Documentary
photo.jpg  pixel-vfl3z5WfW.gifSubscribe69
 
pixel-vfl3z5WfW.gifAdd to pixel-vfl3z5WfW.gifShare
pixel-vfl3z5WfW.gifMore
pixel-vfl3z5WfW.gif24 pixel-vfl3z5WfW.gif4

Published on Feb 27, 2014

BBC Documentary Conspiracy Theories That Turned Out To Be True Documentary

 

 


  • Raymondol, ThomasMurf and Horaciokr like this

#4 Brian Kelshaw

Brian Kelshaw

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 190 posts
  • LocationWolverhampton, UK.

Posted 30 September 2014 - 05:51 AM

That's what I mean Adele, I'm British, and the BBC is a national institution (until it is flogged off to the Power Elite).

As such I can assure you that this is not a BBC production. It may no longer be relied upon to be either impartial nor courageous, but one thing it still has, in spades, is class. Nothing this shoddy would ever be put out by the BBC. Ever.☺☺

Ps, it's publicly funded, through the mandatory "TV licence" which has an annual cost. The 'C' is for Corporation, but it's not strictly a corporation as an American would understand it. The TV licence may fund only the BBC, but one is legally required to receive TV broadcasts from any source in the UK.
  • Raymondol and ThomasMurf like this

#5 Adele Edisen

Adele Edisen

    Founding Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 643 posts

Posted 03 October 2014 - 01:33 PM

Brian,

Whoever posted that video on YouTube apparently claimed it was seen on a BBC broadcast, 

and therefore thought it was a BBC production.  Television and radio broadcasters do borrow 

each others' materials all the time and re-broadcast them.   In this case it appears that a 

viewer was not aware of the origin of the video.  I don't have any better explanation than

that.  YouTube allows just about anyone to post whatever videos they wish, and gives

them whatever titles they want.

 

In any case, the fascinating and interesting information came during the second half

of the video which dealt with connections amongst the Bush family, Harriman, and the 

CIA, etc.   Many researchers have been interested in this aspect, and not much 

attention has been paid to it, in my opinion.

 

I am not criticizing BBC.   I just do not know where the person who posted the video had 

seen it and therefore had to use the poster's title.   Sorry to have upset you and anyone else.


  • ThomasMurf likes this

#6 Brian Kelshaw

Brian Kelshaw

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 190 posts
  • LocationWolverhampton, UK.

Posted 04 October 2014 - 02:17 AM

Adele, you haven't upset me, far from it. I just felt I had to correct the impression given, and I wasn't suggesting you gave that impression. It's quite obvious whoever put 'BBC' in the title did so to grab viewers. I didn't watch it all the way through, but the beginning is definitely not BBC. Perhaps there's a clip of some BBC stuff in there. I dimly remember having seen it before, but I'll watch it all the way through when I get the chance.
  • Raymondol and ThomasMurf like this

#7 Adele Edisen

Adele Edisen

    Founding Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 643 posts

Posted 04 October 2014 - 05:43 AM

 Please let me know what you think of the Bush-Harriman-CIA 

connection.  Prescott Bush, father of George H.W. Bush, and 

grandfather of George W, Bush, was involved in the Wall Street

plot to overthrow President Franklin Roosevelt in 1933-1934,

thirty years before the assassination of John Kennedy.



#8 Robert Harper

Robert Harper

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 34 posts
  • LocationRotterdam & Los Angeles

Posted 04 October 2014 - 07:03 AM

I think this video expands upon the work I originally found in Russ Baker's "Family of Secrets." When one factors in the memo found by Joseph McBride in 1988--Hoover writing that he briefed "George Bush of the CIA" and the writings of  Anthony Sutton on the financing of the Nazi movement by Harriman & Brown Brothers (which became Halliburton) then pieces start falling into place around the rise of the Bush dynasty. Compared to this lineage, and the dual functioning of the Dulles brothers for 8 years, the idea of a Kennedy dynasty--1000 days-is put into perspective.


  • Horaciokr likes this




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Web Work by: XmasZen.com