The purpose of Western media's focus on "ISIS"* (a fictive construct of Western intelligence agencies created at the behest of their masters; but that's a story for another campfire) is to beg the inference that the terrorism playing field is not level.
If Islam bears responsibility for the terror inflicted by "ISIS," then does not Christianity bear responsibility for the Holocaust?
If "radical Islam" bears the responsibility for Middle Eastern terror, then does not "radical Christianity" bear responsibility for the genocide of the native populations of the western hemisphere?
If all Muslims should be identified with and somehow made to pay for the war crimes of attacking the World Trade Center and the Pentagon on 9-11 (operations which of course were not conceived or ordered by Muslims; but that's a story for another campfire), then should not all Christians be identified with and somehow made to pay for the war crimes of the fire bombings of Tokyo and Dresden, the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and the wholesale terror targeting by the Allies of civilian populations in WW II?
Should not every mention of "ISIS" be accompanied by acknowledgment of "CHRISIS"?
Which brings us to consideration of Sabra and Shatila and "JEWSIS".
*I place "ISIS" within quotation marks for the same reason that I write "Colby" and "Herrera" and "Doyle".