Disinformation doyen -- and/or plain old nut -- Judyth Vary Baker is the billed "founder" and "creator" of "JFK Assassination Conference 2016," a major cover-up operation to be staged November 18 - 20 in Dallas.
The conference is being "co-produced" by Lorien Fenton/Conscious Community Events, and is sponsored by the UFO-focused (although not exclusively) Caravan to Midnight radio program and Inception Radio Network.
Announced speakers to date include Baker, Francis Gary Powers, Jr., John Barbour, Ed Tatro, Vince Palamara, and Douglas Caddy.
For those of us who take seriously the study of deep politics, this event presents unmistakeably as what I term a "target and taint" intel op designed to discredit further the JFK research community in general, and in particular its reputable members who participate in or otherwise endorse it.
To wit: If you're with Baker, you're Fetzer-grade certifiable.
In my informed opinion, Messrs. Barbour and Tatro are principled, passionate warriors in the fight for truth and justice for JFK and the millions of souls collaterally damaged by his assassins. Their work -- more often than not of estimable valuable, sometimes highly problematic -- should be well known to readers of this forum
Powers, whose late father requires no introduction, is Founder and Chairman Emeritus of The Cold War Museum. Caddy, a lawyer, is linked to conservative Republican operations and causes and the Nixon Administration and is a not insignificant figure in the Watergate operation.
Baker's ludicrous claims shout for themselves
Target and taint.
If Powers accepts and promotes the shallow, mainstream history of the Cold War -- which is to say, if he rejects the definition of the Cold War as a sophistic construct, illusory in terms of its advertised raison d'etre, all too real in its bloody consequences, created by the powerful yet outnumbered manipulators of perception to preserve and protect control of the many by the few -- then he is part of the problem It's that simple.
Caddy remains a wild card -- one who does not differentiate between Sponsors and Facilitators as he props up patsys in both categories -- and is in efffect if not in fact a cover-up Facilitator.
Then there's Palamara: You can rest assured that no one in attendance will attempt to elicit from him clarification of his views on the nature of the conspiracy -- or if, in fact, he currently espouses the conspiracy truth. (Conference attendees are advised to wear sunglasses during the Great One's presentation; reflections from his omnipresent hand mirror may cause blindness.)
As for the UFO-centric sponsors: Understand that I hold the overall UFO phenomenon to be, in various aspects of its origins and development, both human and non-human in nature. The problem posed by the UFO sponsors of a JFK assassination conference is that they afford to cover-up Facilitators multiple opportunities to equate "believers" in a JFK conspiracy with "believers" in little green men.
So how is news of the Baker conference being greeted by the JFK research community? The only responses I've encountered to date are to be found on the Across the Pond Scum Forum. There, the genteel author of a recently published pro-conspiracy book writes of the "great" speakers at this "intriguing" conference, and the community's insight-free lady legal eagle expresses her wish that good buddy Nathan Darby (the fingerprint expert who confirmed that Mac Wallace's print was indeed discovered in the TSBD "sniper's nest") will be vindicated.
No sense of alarm. Not a hint of deep political awareness, let alone analysis.
As far as one and all are concerned ...
Another job that you hope, at last,
Will make your future forget your past,